Monday, 8 December 2025

Nurse Consultant: UGONSA writes HCSF, counters NAMDA's Petition


The Head of Civil Service of the Federation (HCSF),

Federal Secretariat Complex,

Shehu Shagari Way, P.M.B. 248,

Garki, Central Business Area, Abuja.

 

Madam,

Official Response from the University Graduates of Nursing Science Association (UGONSA) to the Nigerian Association of Medical and Dental Academics (NAMDA) position on Consultant Cadre for other Healthcare Professions

To: The Honourable Head of Service, Federal Civil
Service of the Federation, and to all stakeholders in Nigeria’s health sector

UGONSA has read with grave concern the petition written to your office by the Nigerian Association of Medical and Dental Academics (NAMDA) tilted “PETITION ON THE THREAT TO PATIENTS SAFETY IN THE NATIONS’ HOSPITAL SYSTEM: THE NEED TO STOP THE CREATION OF UNNECESSARY AND ILEGAL CADRES OF HOSPITAL CONSULTANTS AT THE ONGOING NATIONAL COUNCIL ON ESTABLISHMENT MEETING HOLDING IN KANO”.

We categorically reject the assertion that creating regulated cadres of consultant nurses (or accredited advanced nursing roles) will “derail clinical management” or inherently put patients at risk. On the contrary, international evidence and authoritative policy bodies show that enabling nurses to practice at the top of their education and training strengthens health systems, improves access and patient outcomes, and is an essential response to workforce shortages (Institute of Medicine, 2010; Kennedy et al., 2012; Laurant et al., 2018; Royal College of Nursing [RCN], 2021;  World Health Organization, 2021; American Association of Managed Care Nurses [AAMCN], 2025). Below, we state the facts, cite the evidence, and propose safe, practical policy safeguards for Nigeria.

1.       The “consultant” title is not the exclusive preserve of medical doctors. It is used safely in other health systems: NAMDA argues that the title consultant in hospitals is unique to doctors and confers exclusive ultimate responsibility for patient care. The international reality is different. In the United Kingdom, for example, consultant-level nursing posts (commonly called Nurse Consultant) are an established, regulated senior clinical role with defined responsibilities, clinical leadership, service development, education, research, and professional governance, operating within multi-disciplinary teams (Royal College of Nursing [RCN], 2021).

2.       Strong, high-quality evidence shows advanced nursing roles are safe and effective, and improve healthcare access, quality and satisfaction: Evidence-based summaries reach the following conclusions: A major Cochrane review and updates on nurse-led primary care show that substituting nurses for doctors in many primary-care tasks produces similar or better patient health outcomes and higher patient satisfaction, with no clear increase in harm (Laurant et al., 2018). Nurses tend to have longer consultations, and evidence shows at least equivalence for many conditions. Systematic reviews and mixed-methods evaluations of nurse consultant roles (UK and international literature) report improvements in service quality, patient experience, chronic disease management, and workforce development, while noting that well-designed role specification and outcome measurement are essential (RCN, 2021). Where roles are well-structured and evaluated, benefits follow.  Reviews of advanced nursing practice reported consistent improvements in access, chronic disease self-management, and patient satisfaction when Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs), Nurse Consultants, or Clinical Nurse Specialists provide care (AAMCN, 2025). The evidence supports expanding appropriately trained nursing roles to meet unmet needs.  Empirical evidence thus shows that when nurse consultant roles are regulated, educated, and integrated into team governance, outcomes are improved or equivalent to those of physician-led care across many services (Kennedy et al., 2012; Laurant et al., 2018; AAMCN, 2025).

3.       Leading global policy bodies recommend nurses be enabled to work at full scope — Nigeria should align with those recommendations: The Institute of Medicine (IOM; now the National Academy of Medicine) landmark report The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health (2010) concluded that health systems must enable nurses to practice to the full extent of their education and training, expand opportunities for nurses to lead and redesign care, and increase the proportion of nurses with higher levels of education. The IOM made clear that removing scope-of-practice barriers and supporting advanced practice is vital to meet population needs. This remains a cornerstone reference for global health system workforce reform.  The World Health Organization’s Global Strategic Directions for Nursing and Midwifery (SDNM) 2021–2025 likewise urges Member States to strengthen nursing education, regulation, leadership, and practice so nurses can contribute maximally to universal health coverage. That policy recognizes advanced nursing roles as part of the solution to workforce shortfalls and service gaps.

4.       Nigeria has a demonstrable workforce gap — task-sharing and advanced nursing roles are proven, necessary mitigation strategies: Nigeria faces a severe physician shortage and large regional maldistribution of doctors. International comparisons and country data show physician densities in Nigeria are far below WHO-recommended levels; health system resilience demands complementary approaches. Deploying regulated advanced nursing roles is a proven strategy to expand access (particularly in primary care and underserved areas) without lowering standards. Example: where doctor supply is constrained, nurse consultants/nurse practitioners/advanced nurses in many countries provide primary care, emergency care, and chronic-disease management safely and cost-effectively, reducing waiting times, improving continuity of care, and improving outcomes.

5.       The concerns NAMDA raises about accountability, scope, and budgets are addressable — regulation, accredited training, and governance can fix them: NAMDA’s letter raises three recurring fears: (A) loss of clinical accountability, (B) role confusion and conflict, and (C) budgetary bloat. UGONSA responds with practical, evidence-based policy solutions:

A. Legal and clinical accountability — solution: embed advanced nursing roles in statute and regulation. Define clearly (in law/regulation/appointment letters) where medical ultimate responsibility lies and where advanced nurses have autonomous authority (e.g., prescribing, diagnostics, counselling, rehabilitation) under defined scopes. International models use collaborative practice agreements, professional regulation, and hospital governance (credentialing, privileging, clinical guidelines) to ensure clarity.

B. Role clarity and team functioning — solution: adopt national competency frameworks, accredited postgraduate programmes (MSc/Doctoral/APN curricula), formal credentialing, and job descriptions that specify decision-making limits, referral triggers, and escalation pathways. The UK, Canada, Australia, and the US have used these governance mechanisms successfully.

C. Cost/budgeting concerns — solution: pilot with objective evaluation. Where advanced nursing roles reduce admissions and readmissions, improve chronic disease outcomes, or increase clinic throughput, any higher grade pay is offset by system gains (reduced avoidable admissions or readmissions, improved throughput). Evidence from multiple health systems indicates cost-effectiveness and cost reduction. Nigeria has the potential to cut healthcare costs through nurse consultants/advanced nurse practice cadres, as data from countries that have implemented it show.

 

6.        International practice: how countries manage consultant/advanced nursing roles (short examples): United Kingdom (NHS) — Nurse Consultant posts exist within trusts with clear job plans: leadership, expert practice, education, and research. These are senior clinical roles defined by employers and regulated by the Nursing Council. They do not remove physician accountability for acts requiring a medical license.

United States & Canada — Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs), Nurse Practitioners (NPs), and Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNSs) deliver primary care, emergency triage, and specialist clinics under state/provincial regulation; many jurisdictions have independent prescribing and diagnostic authority after credentialing. Cochrane and other systematic reviews find equivalent or better outcomes for many services (Laurant et al., 2018).

Australia — Nurse practitioner roles operate with clear legislation and clinical governance; outcomes and access improvements are documented wherever nurse practitioners were introduced into underserved settings.

These examples show that titles alone are not the threat. The threat (or benefit) is defined by whether roles are accompanied by regulation, training and governance. Nigeria can adopt the best practices to improve the fortune of our distressed health system.

7.       What UGONSA proposes (practical, safety-first roadmap): UGONSA is not asking for ad-hoc titles or tokenism. We propose a staged, defensible policy:

Legal/regulatory framework — the Federal Ministry of Health, working with the Nursing and Midwifery Council of Nigeria (NMCN), National Assembly, and legal drafters, should define legal scopes for Advanced Practice Nurses/nurse consultant-level roles (titles, privileges, limits). This will remove ambiguity and make accountability explicit.

Accredited postgraduate training — all consultant nurses and advanced practitioners must complete accredited postgraduate programmes (master’s level or equivalent; doctoral capability for consultant-level practice as required) with defined competency outcomes.

Federal Ministry of Health Guided Credentialing & hospital privileging — hospitals must credential and privilege based on competencies; the Federal Ministry of Health, in collaboration with the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, should define staging protocols to guide referrals and escalations to higher levels of care.

Pilot programmes and evaluation implement pilots in primary care deserts and tertiary specialty clinics with robust outcome measurement (safety, mortality, readmissions, patient satisfaction, cost) and publish results publicly.

Collaborative practice & clear patient safety protocols — define where medical ultimate responsibility applies (e.g., certain surgical interventions), and where advanced nurses may autonomously manage care (e.g., chronic disease clinics, triage, wound care, palliative care) with mandated referral and escalation rules.

National workforce planning — use the WHO SDNM and IOM recommendations as frameworks to scale advanced practice where workforce shortages are most acute.

8.       Direct rebuttals to some specific claims in the NAMDA petition.

NAMDA: “Consultant pharmacist/nurse roles add no clinical value in hospitals.”

UGONSA Response: International empirical reviews show that pharmacist/nurse consultants add immense value in clinical leadership, service redesign, medication management, diagnostic leverage, system thinking, and patient-centered care that improve access, outcomes, and satisfaction. Where roles are poorly implemented, benefits are muted. Therefore, the remedy is better role design and evaluation, not prohibition.

 

NAMDA: “Appointment to consultant rank is a political back-door and will create role confusion.”

UGONSA Response: Nursing is a globally trusted profession. The trust is why the care of humanity is entrusted to nurses. Nurses must be allowed to advance professionally and academically to continue to add value to the care mandate entrusted to them.  NAMDA should have rather emphasized transparent job criteria, advertised vacancies, competency-based appointment, and statutory regulation for the nurse consultant cadre, and not the denial of role evolution. The RCN/NHS model shows that formalized appointment and job planning are workable safeguards.

 

NAMDA: “We will not work in an environment with these roles.”

UGONSA Response: UGONSA urges constructive collaboration, not threats. Multidisciplinary teams are the future of safe, quality health care; clinical governance frameworks protect patient safety and professional responsibilities for all cadres (IOM, 2010). UGONSA stands ready to discuss specific NAMDA concerns in a joint stakeholder forum.

Conclusion

Nigeria’s health system faces real shortages and growing demand. The Institute of Medicine and the World Health Organization are explicit: nations must enable nurses to practice to the full extent of their training and education, educate nurses to higher levels, and expand nursing leadership in the health system and care redesign. The international evidence shows that advanced nursing roles are safe and often advantageous when implemented with robust regulation and governance. UGONSA therefore reaffirms that we strongly support the creation of regulated, accredited consultant/advanced nursing roles where those roles are defined by law, backed by accredited education, and integrated into hospital governance with clear scopes and accountability. We invite the Office of the Head of Civil Service to galvanize the Federal Ministry of Health, the Medical and Dental Councils, the Nursing and Midwifery Council, NAMDA, Nigeria Medical Association, National Association of Nurses and Midwives, Pharmaceutical Society of Nigeria,  and other stakeholders to establish a joint technical working group to draft legal/regulatory frameworks, an accreditation pathway, pilot sites, and outcome metrics for the consultant cadres of other healthcare professions and to do so in full public view. UGONSA is ready to lead and collaborate on this evidence-based reform to ensure Nigeria’s hospitals deliver safe, accessible, efficient, evidence-based, and modern care for all Nigerians.

Signed:

Nurse Opeyemi Ojo                                                                Nurse Eteng Philip

UGONSA National President                                                UGONSA National Secretary

 

References

American Association of Managed Care Nurses. (2025). Nurse consultant job description. https://careers.aamcn.org/career/nurse-consultant/job-descriptions

Institute of Medicine. (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. The National Academies Press. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24983041/

Kennedy, F., McDonnell, A., Gerrish, K., et al. (2012). Evaluation of the impact of nurse consultant roles in the United Kingdom: a mixed method systematic literature review. J Adv Nurs., 68(4), 721-42. https://doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05811.x. 

Laurant, M., van der Biezen, M., Wijers, N., et al. (2018). Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care. Cochrane Database System Review, 16, 7(7):CD001271. https://doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub3.

Royal College of Nursing. (2021). Consultant level nursing. https://www.rcn.org.uk/Professional-Development/Levels-of-nursing/Consultant

World Health Organization. (2021). Global strategic directions for nursing and midwifery 2021–2025.  https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240033863

 

No comments:

Post a Comment